The theoretical aspects and principles of creation and functioning social-entrepreneurial corporations.
Keywords:
socio-entrepreneurial сorporation (SЕC), «entrepreneurship», «sociality», «social entrepreneurship», enterprise, corporation, financial resources, assets, subsurface resources, development of non-extractive sectors, social Fund,Abstract
Success of macroeconomic reforms implemented to date in Kazakhstan, created favorable conditions for a shift of focus on regional development policy as an important and promising tool to improve the overall level of socialeconomic development of the country whose potential still has not been used to the full. Thus, according to this message, President NursultanNazarbayev to the people of Kazakhstan (March, 2006), as a result of the search for new tools for development of non-primary sectors, more adapted to the conditions prevailing in Kazakhstan, with an emphasis on regional development appeared social-entrepreneurial corporations (SEC). Socio-entrepreneurial corporationsvirtuallyrelegated to the roleof the basic mechanismto ensurea breakthrougheconomic and socialdevelopment of the country, until the occurrenceof the 30 mostdeveloped countriesof the worldReferences
1. Shumpeter I. Teoriya economicheskogo razvitiya. Proizvodit nechto inoe ili inache – znachit cozdat drugie kombinacii iz etih vegjeiisil. – М., 1982. – 294 с.
2. Shumpeter I. “Rolpromishkennoi politiki gosudarstva v razvitii predprinimatelstva v Rossii”. – 1982. – С.158.
3. Nureev R.M. Ekonomika razvitiya: modeli stanovleniya rinochnoi ekonomiki. Uchebnoe posobie. – М., INFRA, 2001. –С.152.
4. Mangan, 2004; Dart, 2004; Prabhu, 1999; Thompson, et al., 2000; Mair& Marti, 2004.Obzoropita I koncepcii socialnogopredprinimatelstva s uchenom vozmojnostei.
5. «Socialnoe predprinimatelstvo» // Philanthropy News Digest, - 09.07.2006. - №8. – С.32.
6. Peregudov C. Krupnaya Rossiiskaya korporaciya kak socialno-politicheskii institute. – М., 2000. – 14 с.
7. Hil V.Akcionernii capital I gruppi, zainteresovannie v uspehepredpriyatiya // Problemiteorii I praktikiupravleniya. – 1997. –№ 5. – С. 45.
8. Strahova L.P., Bartnev A.E. Korporativnoe obrazovaniyе v sovremennoi economike // Menedjment v Rossii I zarubejom. – 2000. – № 6. – С. 24.
9. Anosoff I. Novaiya korporativnaiya strategiya. – SPB.: Piter, 1999. – 113 с.
10. Koncepciya sozdaniya regionalnih socialno-predprinimatelskih korporacii. Postanovlenie pravitelstva RK 31 maiya 2006
goda. – № 483.
11. Schumpeter, Theory of Economic Development. "To produce something else anyway - then create other combinations of these things and forces". – M., 1982. – S. 294.
12. Schumpeter, "The role of industrial policy in the development of entrepreneurship in Russia". – 1982. – С.158.
13. Nureyev RM Development Economics: model of a market economy. Textbook. – М., INFRA, 2001. – С. 152.
14. Mangan, 2004; Dart, 2004; Prabhu, 1999; Thompson, et al., 2000; Mair& Marti, 2004. A review of experiences and concepts of social entrepreneurship, taking into account opportunities.
15. "Social Entrepreneurship»//Philanthropy News Digest, - 09.07.2006. – № 8. – P. 32-6.
16. Peregoudov C. Major Russian corporation as a socio-political institution. – M., 2000. – С. 14.
17. Gil B. Equity capital and groups interested in the success of pre acceptance / / Problems of the theory and practice of management. – 1997. – № 5. – Р. 45.
18. Strakhov LP Bartenev AE Corporate education in modern economy ¬ variable / / Management in Russia and abroad. – 2000.– № 6. – Р. 24.
19. Ansoff I. The new corporate strategy. – St. Petersburg: – Peter, 1999. – 113c.
20. The concept of creating regional socio-entrepreneurial corporations. Decision of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated May 31, 2006. – № 483.
2. Shumpeter I. “Rolpromishkennoi politiki gosudarstva v razvitii predprinimatelstva v Rossii”. – 1982. – С.158.
3. Nureev R.M. Ekonomika razvitiya: modeli stanovleniya rinochnoi ekonomiki. Uchebnoe posobie. – М., INFRA, 2001. –С.152.
4. Mangan, 2004; Dart, 2004; Prabhu, 1999; Thompson, et al., 2000; Mair& Marti, 2004.Obzoropita I koncepcii socialnogopredprinimatelstva s uchenom vozmojnostei.
5. «Socialnoe predprinimatelstvo» // Philanthropy News Digest, - 09.07.2006. - №8. – С.32.
6. Peregudov C. Krupnaya Rossiiskaya korporaciya kak socialno-politicheskii institute. – М., 2000. – 14 с.
7. Hil V.Akcionernii capital I gruppi, zainteresovannie v uspehepredpriyatiya // Problemiteorii I praktikiupravleniya. – 1997. –№ 5. – С. 45.
8. Strahova L.P., Bartnev A.E. Korporativnoe obrazovaniyе v sovremennoi economike // Menedjment v Rossii I zarubejom. – 2000. – № 6. – С. 24.
9. Anosoff I. Novaiya korporativnaiya strategiya. – SPB.: Piter, 1999. – 113 с.
10. Koncepciya sozdaniya regionalnih socialno-predprinimatelskih korporacii. Postanovlenie pravitelstva RK 31 maiya 2006
goda. – № 483.
11. Schumpeter, Theory of Economic Development. "To produce something else anyway - then create other combinations of these things and forces". – M., 1982. – S. 294.
12. Schumpeter, "The role of industrial policy in the development of entrepreneurship in Russia". – 1982. – С.158.
13. Nureyev RM Development Economics: model of a market economy. Textbook. – М., INFRA, 2001. – С. 152.
14. Mangan, 2004; Dart, 2004; Prabhu, 1999; Thompson, et al., 2000; Mair& Marti, 2004. A review of experiences and concepts of social entrepreneurship, taking into account opportunities.
15. "Social Entrepreneurship»//Philanthropy News Digest, - 09.07.2006. – № 8. – P. 32-6.
16. Peregoudov C. Major Russian corporation as a socio-political institution. – M., 2000. – С. 14.
17. Gil B. Equity capital and groups interested in the success of pre acceptance / / Problems of the theory and practice of management. – 1997. – № 5. – Р. 45.
18. Strakhov LP Bartenev AE Corporate education in modern economy ¬ variable / / Management in Russia and abroad. – 2000.– № 6. – Р. 24.
19. Ansoff I. The new corporate strategy. – St. Petersburg: – Peter, 1999. – 113c.
20. The concept of creating regional socio-entrepreneurial corporations. Decision of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated May 31, 2006. – № 483.
Downloads
Issue
Section
ECONOMICS
