Modeling of oil revenues impact to the dynamics of main macroeconomic indicators of Кazakhstan

Authors

  • T. I. Kakizhanova Казахский национальный университет им. аль-Фараби
  • B. M. Mukhamediev Казахский национальный университет им. аль-Фараби

Keywords:

economics, modeling, general equilibrium, model of dynamic, stochastic model, monetary policy, the new Keynesian model,

Abstract

This paper presents a model of the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium for the economy of Kazakhstan. Parameters of the model were evaluated. The model includes oil production sector , which plays an important role in the economy, and provides a significant share of revenues to the state budget. Response functions of macroeconomic indicators to internal and external shocks to the economy of Kazakhstan were analyzed. Internal shocks are a shock of performance in the final goods sector, a productivity shock in the oil sector, a labor preference shock, a shock of monetary policy, external shocks are an oil price shock, an oil demand abroad shock and a shock of a production abroad. Accounting of indicators responses to shocks will allow to predict the consequences of decisions in the economy, as well as external influences to the economy.

References

1.Kydland F. E., Prescott E. C. Time to build and aggregate fluctuations // Econometrica. - 1982. – Vol. 50. – P. 1345-1370.

2 Calvo G. Staggered prices in a utility maximizing framework // Journal of Monetary Economics. – 1983. – №12. – P. 383–398.

3 Smets F., Wouters R. An estimated stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model of the euro area // Journal of the European
Economic Association/ - 2003. – Vol. 1, No. 5. - P. 123-1175.

4 Lucas R. E. Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique // Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. - 1976. –Vol.1. – P. 19-46.

5 Dib A. An estimated Canadian DSGE model with nominal and real rigidities // Bank of Canada. Working Paper. – 2001. – 26 p.

6 Medina J., Soto C. The Chilean business cycle through the lens of a stochastic general equilibrium model // Central Bank of Chile. Working Papers. – 2007. - No. 457.

7 Kumhof M., Laxton D., Muir D., Mursula S. The Global Integrated Monetary and Fiscal Model (GIMF) //IMF Working
Paper. – 2010. - WP 1034.

8 Galí J., Monacelli T. Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy // The Review of Economic
Studies. – 2005. – Vol. 72. - No. 3. – P. 707–734.

9 Andrle M. A note on identification patterns in DSGE models // ECB Working Paper 123. – 2010.

10 Curdia V., Woodford M. Credit spreads and monetary policy // Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. – 2010. – Vol. 42. -No.1. - P. 3-35.

11 Clarida R., Gali J., Gertler M.(1997). Monetary policy rules in practice: some international evidence // NBER . - WP 6254.

12 Мухамедиев Б.М. Правила денежно-кредитной политики Национального банка Казахстана // Quantile. – 2007. - № 3. -С. 91-106. (Россия, Москва).

Downloads