Modeling of interregional migration in Kazakhstan
48 41
Keywords:
interregional migration, the gravity model, panel data, fixed effects.Abstract
Modeling of interregional migration processes is leading direction for economic research. The push-pull theory of migration factors is one of the main theories of interregional migration. In each region can be identified factors which retaining population in a given territory (neutral factors), pro pelling (push-factors) or attracting (pull-factors) them. Simultaneously with these factors, also have various other circumstances (third group of factors) that act as a limitation of migration flows (intermediate barriers such as trans portation costs, legislative restrictions on movement, lack of information about the possible region of arrival, etc.). In addition, there are still personal subjective factors affecting the acceleration or deceleration of migration be cause of unequal propensity to migration. An extended version of the gravity model in the specification of I. Etzo estimated at the article based on panel data of Kazakhstan for 1999-2012 years. Also are shown the main trends of interregional migration in Kazakhstan and discusses the econometric estima tion aspects of gravity models of interregional migration.References
1 Young E.C. The Movement of the Farm Population // Ithaca: New York Agricultural Experiment Station. – 1924. – Bulletin
426.
2 Lee E. A theory of migration // Demography. – 1966. – V. 3. – P. 47-57.
3 Chen A., Coulson N. E. Determinants of urban migration: Evidence from Chinese cities // Urban Studies. – 2002. – 39 (12).
– P. 2189 – 2197.
4 Andrienko Y., Guriev S. Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. Evidencefrompaneldata // EconomicsofTransi-tion. – 2004. – 12(1). – P. 1 – 27.
5 Mulhern A., Watson J. Spanish internal migration: Is there anything new to say? // Spatial Economic Analysis. – 2009. – 4(1). – P. 103 – 120.
6 Nguyen-Hoang P., McPeak J. Leaving or staying: Inter-provincial migration in Vietnam // Asian and Pacific Migration Jour-nal. – 2010. – 19(4). – P. 473 – 500.
7 Etzo I. The determinants of the recent interregional migration flows in Italy: a panel data analysis // Journal of Regional Science. – 2011. – 51(5). – P. 948 – 966.
8 Baltagi B.H. Econometric analysis of panel data. – Fifth edition. – Wiley, 2013. – 378 p.
426.
2 Lee E. A theory of migration // Demography. – 1966. – V. 3. – P. 47-57.
3 Chen A., Coulson N. E. Determinants of urban migration: Evidence from Chinese cities // Urban Studies. – 2002. – 39 (12).
– P. 2189 – 2197.
4 Andrienko Y., Guriev S. Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. Evidencefrompaneldata // EconomicsofTransi-tion. – 2004. – 12(1). – P. 1 – 27.
5 Mulhern A., Watson J. Spanish internal migration: Is there anything new to say? // Spatial Economic Analysis. – 2009. – 4(1). – P. 103 – 120.
6 Nguyen-Hoang P., McPeak J. Leaving or staying: Inter-provincial migration in Vietnam // Asian and Pacific Migration Jour-nal. – 2010. – 19(4). – P. 473 – 500.
7 Etzo I. The determinants of the recent interregional migration flows in Italy: a panel data analysis // Journal of Regional Science. – 2011. – 51(5). – P. 948 – 966.
8 Baltagi B.H. Econometric analysis of panel data. – Fifth edition. – Wiley, 2013. – 378 p.
Downloads
How to Cite
Bordoussov, O. V., & Zholamanova, M. A. (2016). Modeling of interregional migration in Kazakhstan. Journal of Economic Research &Amp; Business Administration, 107(1). Retrieved from https://be.kaznu.kz/index.php/math/article/view/879
Issue
Section
Without section
