Role of intellectual property in open innovation models
53 58
53 23
Keywords:
innovational activity, innovational management, open innovation, consumer’s innovation, total innovation, human capital, spin-offs, venture systems, intellectual property, insourcing, outsourcing, research trends, business-models, business-purposes,Abstract
Abstract. Innovative development of economy is considered today by many countries as one of the main ways of economic growth, ensuring competitiveness. The most discussed questions of innovations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are: institutes, finance, regulation, shots, technologies, intellectual property rights. Such rather new aspect of research as open innovation can become the integral element in the mechanism of realization of Strategy of industrial and innovative development of Kazakhstan. In spite of the fact that studying of questions of innovative development was widely adopted at us in the country, the problem of open innovations is the new direction which has appeared recently in foreign literature. In this article the essence of new approach in management of innovative activity, namely application of model of open innovations for maximizing profit of the company reveals. Also comparison of the principles of traditional innovative management with the principles of management on the basis of open innovations is given that in turn leads to an explanation of trends of management on the basis of model of open innovations.References
1. Chesbrough, Henry and Adrienne Kardon Crowther (2006) “Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries,” R&D Management, 36, 3 (June): 229-236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467 9310.2006.00428.x
2. Chesbrough, Henry, Wim Vanhaverbeke and Joel West, eds. (2006) OpenInnovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Christensen, Jens Frøslev (2006) “Whither Core Competency for the Large Corporation in an Open Innovation World?,” in Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West, eds., Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35-61.
4. Christensen, Jens Frøslev, Michael Holm Olesen and Jonas Sorth Kjær (2005). “The Industrial Dynamics of Open Innovation — Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics.” Research Policy, 34, 10 (December): 1533-1549. DOI: 10.1016/j. respol.2005.07.002
5. Cooke, Philip (2005) “Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organisation,”Research Policy, 34, 8 (October): 1128-1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
6. Cooke, Philip (2006) “Regional Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems and Clusters in the Asymmetric. Knowledge Economy,” In Stefano Breschi & Franco Malerba (eds.), Clusters, Networks & Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. http://openinnovation.berkeley.edu/what_is_oi.html
8. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3), 35–41
9. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press
10. Penin, Julien, Caroline Hussler and Burger-Helmchen, Thierry, (2011): New shapes and new stakes: a portrait of open innovation as a promising phenomenon Journal of Innovation Economics, n°7, 11–29.
11. Vemuri, V.; Bertone, V.: Will the Open Source Movement Survive a Litigious Society?, in: Electronic Markets, 14, 2, 2004, pp. 114–123.
2. Chesbrough, Henry, Wim Vanhaverbeke and Joel West, eds. (2006) OpenInnovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Christensen, Jens Frøslev (2006) “Whither Core Competency for the Large Corporation in an Open Innovation World?,” in Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West, eds., Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35-61.
4. Christensen, Jens Frøslev, Michael Holm Olesen and Jonas Sorth Kjær (2005). “The Industrial Dynamics of Open Innovation — Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics.” Research Policy, 34, 10 (December): 1533-1549. DOI: 10.1016/j. respol.2005.07.002
5. Cooke, Philip (2005) “Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organisation,”Research Policy, 34, 8 (October): 1128-1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
6. Cooke, Philip (2006) “Regional Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems and Clusters in the Asymmetric. Knowledge Economy,” In Stefano Breschi & Franco Malerba (eds.), Clusters, Networks & Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. http://openinnovation.berkeley.edu/what_is_oi.html
8. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3), 35–41
9. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press
10. Penin, Julien, Caroline Hussler and Burger-Helmchen, Thierry, (2011): New shapes and new stakes: a portrait of open innovation as a promising phenomenon Journal of Innovation Economics, n°7, 11–29.
11. Vemuri, V.; Bertone, V.: Will the Open Source Movement Survive a Litigious Society?, in: Electronic Markets, 14, 2, 2004, pp. 114–123.
How to Cite
Tagaibekova, N. P. (2015). Role of intellectual property in open innovation models. Journal of Economic Research &Amp; Business Administration, 100(6), 205–212. Retrieved from https://be.kaznu.kz/index.php/math/article/view/562
Issue
Section
ECONOMICS
