Quality of life of the population, connected with health, as the basis of formation of the human capital in Republik of Kazakhstan.
55 206
Keywords:
human capital, quality of life, health, quality of life index, questionnaire SF-36,Abstract
Population-based studies related to health of the population and the definition of quality of life based on the SF-36 questionnaire, carried out in many countries of the world, in Kazakhstan, such a study was conducted for the first time. The aim of the present work was to study the quality of life of the population 6 regions. Method was used assess the quality of life of the population on the basis of the subjective perception of the individual (J.Ware, 1988). The basis of this technique is the questionnaire MOS SF-36, which consists of 36 questions for assessing quality of life, based on the health of eight scales. All were interviewed more than 4,000 people. The paper presents the results of a study of quality of life of women. Implementation of this methodology for studying the quality of life in Kazakhstan opens up new opportunities for integrated assessment of health status, satisfaction with various aspects of life that will develop programs to improve the quality of life, both the municipal and regional level, which in turn will contribute to the qualitative growth human capital.References
1. Address by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev to the People of Kazakhstan. 29 января 2010 года. Новое десятилетие – Новый экономический подъем – Новые возможности Казахстана. http://www.akorda.kz/ last accessed April, 18, 2012
2. Preston SH. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. Popul. Sud. 1975. 29:231-48
3. Rodgers, G.B. Income and Inequality as Determinants of Mortality: An International Cross-Section Analysis. Population Studies. 1979. 33(2): 343-351.
4. Wilkinson, R.G. Income Distribution and Life Expectancy. BMJ: British Medical Journal.1992. 304(6820): 165-168.
5. Wagstaff A., E. van Doorslaer Income Inequality and Health: What Does the Literature Tell Us? // Annual Review of Public Health. 2000. 21:543–67
6. Lynch, J., G.D. Smith, G.A. Kaplan, and J.S. House. Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. 2000. BMJ 320(7243): 1200-1204
7. Kislitsina O. Neravenstvo v rasredelenii dohodov i zdorovia v sovremennoi Rossii. М.: RIC ISEPN. 2005. 376 с.
8. Akanov А.А., Germanuk Т.А., Sirina N.V. Kathestvo zhizni kak kriteriy ozenki effektivnosti suschestvuyuschey systemy zdravoohranenia// Problemy socialnoy mediciny I upravlenia zdravoohraneniem.-1997.-№5.
9. Isaev D.С., Tretyakova С.N., Dzhulanova К.N., Balmahaeva R.М., Kalmahanov С.B. O nekotoryh aspectah katchestva zhizni naselenia Respubliki Kazakhstan na sovremennom etape // Problemy socialnoy mediciny I upravlenia zdravoohraneniem. – А., 2005. - №35. – s. 69-72.
10. Goleva О.P., Sakorkina N.А., Popushanskiy V.G., Blinova Е.G. Fprmirovanie khronitcheskih sabolevanii u podrostkov // Problemy socialnoy mediciny I upravlenia zdravoohraneniem. – 2005. -№6. – s.16-18
11. Boiko U.P., Dobriden О.V., Boiko A.U. Obraz zhizni I zdorovie pozhilih ludey // Problemy socialnoy gigieny, zdravoohranenia I istorii mediciny. – 2005. -№6. – s.18-19.
12. Akanov А.А., Tulebeyev К.А., Slazheneva Т.I., Haydarova Т.С., Seydumanov С.Т. Politica formirovania zdorovogo obraza zhizni v Respublike Kazakhstan: stanovlenie I razvitie. Almaty, 2010
13. Terentyev L.A. Katchestvo zhizni naselenis regiona (na primere Krasnodarskogo kraya) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 11. 2009. Vyp. 1 s. 176-183
14. Ware. John E. MOS SF-36 Health Status Survey. SPINE, 2000. Volume 25, Number 24, pp 3130–3139
15. Ware JE. How to Score the Revised MOS Short-Form Health Scale (SF-36®). Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Hospitals, 1988.
16. Ware, J.E., Brook, R.H., Davies-Avery, A., et al. (1980a) Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study: Vol. I, Model of Health and Methodology, The RAND Corporation, R-1987/1-H EW.
17. McHorney C., Ware J., Raczek A., 1993
18. Cronbach, L. J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests; Psychometrika, 16, 297-334; 1951
19. SF-36® PCS, MCS and NBS Calculator. http://www.sf 36.org/nbscalc/index.shtml. last accessed April, 18, 2012
20. Amirdjanova V.N., Goryatchev D.N., Korshunov N.I., Rebrov A.P., Sorockaya V.N. Populationnye pocazateli katchestva zhizni po oprosniku SF-36 (resultaty mnogomernogog issledovania katchestva zhizni «MIRAZH»), Nautchno-praktitcheskaya revmatologia, № 1, 2008
21. Address by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev to the People of Kazakhstan. Socio-Economic Modernization as Main Vector of Development of Kazakhstan, January 27, 2012. http://www.akorda.kz/ last accessed April, 18, 2012
2. Preston SH. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. Popul. Sud. 1975. 29:231-48
3. Rodgers, G.B. Income and Inequality as Determinants of Mortality: An International Cross-Section Analysis. Population Studies. 1979. 33(2): 343-351.
4. Wilkinson, R.G. Income Distribution and Life Expectancy. BMJ: British Medical Journal.1992. 304(6820): 165-168.
5. Wagstaff A., E. van Doorslaer Income Inequality and Health: What Does the Literature Tell Us? // Annual Review of Public Health. 2000. 21:543–67
6. Lynch, J., G.D. Smith, G.A. Kaplan, and J.S. House. Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. 2000. BMJ 320(7243): 1200-1204
7. Kislitsina O. Neravenstvo v rasredelenii dohodov i zdorovia v sovremennoi Rossii. М.: RIC ISEPN. 2005. 376 с.
8. Akanov А.А., Germanuk Т.А., Sirina N.V. Kathestvo zhizni kak kriteriy ozenki effektivnosti suschestvuyuschey systemy zdravoohranenia// Problemy socialnoy mediciny I upravlenia zdravoohraneniem.-1997.-№5.
9. Isaev D.С., Tretyakova С.N., Dzhulanova К.N., Balmahaeva R.М., Kalmahanov С.B. O nekotoryh aspectah katchestva zhizni naselenia Respubliki Kazakhstan na sovremennom etape // Problemy socialnoy mediciny I upravlenia zdravoohraneniem. – А., 2005. - №35. – s. 69-72.
10. Goleva О.P., Sakorkina N.А., Popushanskiy V.G., Blinova Е.G. Fprmirovanie khronitcheskih sabolevanii u podrostkov // Problemy socialnoy mediciny I upravlenia zdravoohraneniem. – 2005. -№6. – s.16-18
11. Boiko U.P., Dobriden О.V., Boiko A.U. Obraz zhizni I zdorovie pozhilih ludey // Problemy socialnoy gigieny, zdravoohranenia I istorii mediciny. – 2005. -№6. – s.18-19.
12. Akanov А.А., Tulebeyev К.А., Slazheneva Т.I., Haydarova Т.С., Seydumanov С.Т. Politica formirovania zdorovogo obraza zhizni v Respublike Kazakhstan: stanovlenie I razvitie. Almaty, 2010
13. Terentyev L.A. Katchestvo zhizni naselenis regiona (na primere Krasnodarskogo kraya) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 11. 2009. Vyp. 1 s. 176-183
14. Ware. John E. MOS SF-36 Health Status Survey. SPINE, 2000. Volume 25, Number 24, pp 3130–3139
15. Ware JE. How to Score the Revised MOS Short-Form Health Scale (SF-36®). Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Hospitals, 1988.
16. Ware, J.E., Brook, R.H., Davies-Avery, A., et al. (1980a) Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study: Vol. I, Model of Health and Methodology, The RAND Corporation, R-1987/1-H EW.
17. McHorney C., Ware J., Raczek A., 1993
18. Cronbach, L. J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests; Psychometrika, 16, 297-334; 1951
19. SF-36® PCS, MCS and NBS Calculator. http://www.sf 36.org/nbscalc/index.shtml. last accessed April, 18, 2012
20. Amirdjanova V.N., Goryatchev D.N., Korshunov N.I., Rebrov A.P., Sorockaya V.N. Populationnye pocazateli katchestva zhizni po oprosniku SF-36 (resultaty mnogomernogog issledovania katchestva zhizni «MIRAZH»), Nautchno-praktitcheskaya revmatologia, № 1, 2008
21. Address by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev to the People of Kazakhstan. Socio-Economic Modernization as Main Vector of Development of Kazakhstan, January 27, 2012. http://www.akorda.kz/ last accessed April, 18, 2012
Downloads
How to Cite
Mukhanova G. К. (2015). Quality of life of the population, connected with health, as the basis of formation of the human capital in Republik of Kazakhstan. Journal of Economic Research &Amp; Business Administration, 100(6), 126–136. Retrieved from https://be.kaznu.kz/index.php/math/article/view/550
Issue
Section
ECONOMICS
